But, all those failures are the sound we want to hear!!! The computer is the "perfect" player. A human orchestra is the most infamous kit of failures you can have. Even the fact you could get the sound and the expression very close to a human orchestra, man, nothing can replace a human being. Sorry, because I can't help you about which is (and where is) the best soundfont file to your music.ģ) Playing. Not perfect, but very close to the reality. And it depens on the kind of music you want to get, too!!! For me, as a christian musician, best sounds I get from the "GeneralUser GS MuseScore v1.44.sf2" soundfont file. If you don't like the sound you get from those files, well you just have to change it. As MuseScore (and most all the today music software) uses SoundFont libraries (on files), we depend absolutely of them. are things we can control with the program controls (into MuseScore, you have to experiment with the Palette, the Synthesizer and the Mixer windows and its controls).Ģ) Sound. Things like tempo, instruments volumen, dynamics, legato, stacatto, etc. We can "attack" this problem from, at least, three different perspectives:ġ) Expression.
Your question is "THE" question on computing world music.
0 kommentar(er)
